|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Giacomo Puccini |
With the death of Giuseppe Verdi in 1901, Giacomo Puccini instantly became the world's foremost composer of opera and its dominant musician. Although his voice was definitely Italian, he was always a very eclectic composer, the master of all contemporary styles. Puccini was especially adept with the whole-tone scale and its characteristic "impressionist" harmonies, which he blended seamlessly with both the conventional diatonic scale and the pentatonic scale, which is prominent in the "Spaghetti Western," La fanciulla del West (1910), and both "oriental" operas, Madama Butterfly (1904) and Turandot (1926). But more important than his sound and technique, which can be easily analyzed according to traditional theoretic principles, is the visceral, physical and emotional impact Puccini's music has on its listeners. Some would ascribe the "Puccini effect" to the composer being an exponent of versimo opera, but this term (its meaning is discussed more thoroughly in the Mascagni section) really only applies to one Puccini opera, Il tabarro (1918). Eclectic as he was, Puccini was very consistent in one regard: evoking the most intense emotional response possible from his audience. In order to achieve this in his unique way, he needed more time, more bars of music than are found in the typical one-act verismo opera. To make his listeners ascend those emotional peaks that are so exhilarating Puccini had to subtly (and often not-so-subtly) build up an exquisite kind of tension in the music that ultimately begged for a release. He did this organically, in a grand mosaic of melodic fragments repeated frequently, some of which would blossom into rhapsodic climaxes, others that would merely tease the ear, leading to a "blind alley" as it were. Inherent in this approach, which one critic unkindly labeled a "bag of tricks," is the composer's willingness to produce many bars of "low energy" music, in order to both provide a distinct contrast to the fireworks to come, and to lull the listener into a kind of repose which would make the musical orgasms all the more intense. |
|
To accomplish what he did, Puccini had to be a musical genius of the first order, and for this he certainly had the right pedigree, representing the fifth consecutive generation of professional musicians on his father's side. Puccini was born and raised in Lucca. His father, Michele, died when Giacomo was still a boy but his mother, Albina, was a very strong-willed woman who gave him a firm upbringing and wrote a very effective plea to the Queen of Italy for financial assistance for her son when he applied for entry into the Milan Conservatory. Her family was also musical - it was her brother who gave Giacomo his first music lessons. She also had a doctor in her family who became a kind of "rich uncle" to Puccini in times of financial need. Not quite the youthful prodigy that Verdi was, Puccini nevertheless displayed the kind of musical talent at an early age that seemed to promise a brilliant career. Like all successful people, Puccini enjoyed his |
|
![]() Amilcare Ponchielli |
![]() Ferdinando Fontana with Puccini |
share of
good fortune, and it was a stroke of luck that his main composition
instructor at the Conservatory was Amilcare Ponchielli (1834-1836),
famous for his opera, La Gioconda. When Puccini impressed
many with his graduation composition, Capriccio sinfonica,
Ponchielli not only introduced Puccini to his first librettist,
Ferdinando Fontana, but brought the young composer to the attention
of publishing magnate Giulio Ricordi and Verdi librettist Arrigo
Boito. The poet happily used his considerable influence to have the
first Puccini-Fontana opera, the one-act Le villi, staged at
Milan's Teatro del Verme in May of 1884. This premiere was so successful that Ricordi bought the rights to it and had the opera produced in a two-act version in Turin in December. He |
||
|
||||
![]() Abbé Prévost |
![]() Jules Massenet |
who judiciously named
his opera Manon Lescaut, had no qualms about composing
the piece and said, "Massenet feels it as a Frenchman, with the
powder and the minuets. I shall feel it as an Italian, with
desperate passion." Ricordi had no qualms either, happy to get his
protégé working on a project, which, if successful, promised to
bring in plenty of royalties and to get his squeamish board members
off his back. Thus Puccini began a string of operas that were both named after women and musically and dramatically focused squarely on the heroine of each (all but two subsequent Puccini operas, both one-acts, Il tabarro and Gianni Schicchi). This is not really against the grain of Italian opera tradition, but it has given psychology- oriented critics a great deal of material in their analyses of Puccini, who was raised by a woman and had lasting relations with several of his sisters. He also had a |
| very tempestuous
relationship with Elvira Gemignani, the wife of a prominent Lucchese
businessman and a former piano student, with whom Puccini had an
illicit affair that began right about the time of the death
of his mother in 1884. Like Verdi before him, Puccini attempted to
live openly with his mistress in his home town, but the Lucchese
were so scandalized by this that the lovers had to move first to Milan and
then to the isolated Torre del Lago near Lucca. They had one son,
Tonio, born in 1886, who was legitimized when the couple finally
married in 1904. Ricordi, who was so active in Puccini's professional career, always believed that Elvira was no good for the composer and encouraged him to spend as much time as possible away from home. The publisher would have been very happy if Puccini had fallen in love with another woman, but the composer, who did have the inclination to stray, only seemed to take up with maids, waitresses and the like, not the kind of women with whom he was likely to get serious. While it is arguable that Elvira was really good for |
|
| Puccini, he needed her, and even when the couple split up for a while because of the notorious Doria Manfredi affair of 1908 (when Elvira was almost jailed because she had hounded that innocent girl into committing suicide), the composer was only too happy to reconcile with his jealous spouse. | |
![]() Ruggiero Leoncavallo |
![]() Marco Praga |
|
Here we can discern another curious pattern emerging, namely Puccini's inability to manage his librettists. Fortunately, Giulio Ricordi so believed in Puccini's musical genius that for the rest of his life he repeatedly acted as a kind of referee between composer and poets. This was especially the case with the frequent and acrimonious exchanges between Puccini and two more librettists, who were not only the next to work on Manon Lescaut, but who also collaborated on the following three (and the most popular) of the composer's operas. Luigi Illica (1857-1919) and Giuseppe Giacosa (1847-1906) worked as a team with Puccini, with Illica supplying the dramatic structure and Giacosa responsible for versification. As the creative process progressed in all of their collaborations from Manon Lescaut on, at some point or other, one or both of the librettists threatened to quit. Typically Puccini |
![]() Luigi Illica |
![]() Giuseppe Giacosa |
| would argue
vociferously, sometimes all night long, for some kind of alteration,
and after the librettists
reluctantly gave in, often as soon as the next day, Puccini would
change his mind and the librettists would go ballistic. At this
point, Ricordi would have to step in and somehow salvage the
situation. With Manon Lescaut, the publisher even had to
write a few lines. Ultimately none of the six librettists who worked
on the opera wanted their names associated with it. Sensing a success, Ricordi still did not want the premiere of Manon Lescaut staged at La Scala for the 1893 season, especially because it would have to compete with Verdi's last opera, Falstaff. The publisher was also fully aware of Puccini's volatile emotional makeup, and did not want to risk shattering the composer's self esteem with another failure in Milan, so the premiere for Manon Lescaut was staged at the Teatro Regio in Turin on February 1. It was a decisive triumph, an international hit that marked the turning point in the composer's career. It also helped that Ricordi made it mandatory for any company interested in Falstaff to produce Puccini's opera as well. From this point on, Puccini could dictate his own terms with any aspect of opera composition. |
||
According to Leoncavallo, in the winter of 1892, after he had become famous for his I pagliacci, and shortly before the premiere of Manon Lescaut, he had approached Puccini with an offer to compose the music to a finished libretto based on Scènes de la vie de Bohème, a popular novel by Henry Murger (1822-1861) adapted into a wildly successful play by Théodore Barrière. Puccini turned the offer down, probably too selfish to collaborate with someone as well known as Leoncavallo. He did, however, want to work on another sure-fire subject, so he got Ricordi to enlist Illica and Giocosa to write a libretto derived from the French novel and play, even as he negotiated for the rights to La lupa, by Giovanni Verga, from whom Mascagni acquired Cavalleria rusticana. The result was Puccini's second consecutive success, La bohème, premiered on February 1, |
![]() Henry Murger |
![]() Arturo Toscanini |
|
1896, once again in Turin, with the then
23-year-old Arturo Toscanini conducting. Although many critics, then and now, have considered La bohème to be too sentimental, it has always been a hit with the public and remains to this day Puccini's most popular opera. Part of the reason for this is that audiences identify so closely with the characters. (After all, how many of us have not had our own "Bohemian period" in our lives?) Puccini himself, with his roommate Mascagni, sometimes dodged the landlord during their impoverished student days in Milan. Some of this experience surely gives the opera some extent of freshness and credibility. |
||
![]() Alberto Franchetti |
![]() Victorien Sardou |
![]() Sarah Bernhardt |
For his next opera, Puccini again chose as his subject a popular play - and once more yet another composer was bamboozled because of it. Alberto Franchetti (1860-1942) was chosen by Ricordi to compose an opera based on La Tosca (1887), an internationally famous play written for the legendary actress Sarah Bernhardt (1844-1924) by the well known French playwright Victorien Sardou (1831-1908). Franchetti was given the rights to the play by Ricordi even though Puccini had wanted them for himself as early as 1889. Although he genuinely believed that Puccini's talent would pay off in the future, apparently the publisher was not inclined to award |
|
such a plum as Tosca to the composer so soon after the disastrous premiere of Edgar. But just a few years later, after Illica had even written a libretto for Franchetti, it was clear to Ricordi that Puccini could compose far better than anyone, so the publisher and librettist convinced Franchetti to relinquish the rights to a subject that would not be right for an opera. Imagine Franchetti's surprise, when just a day after he gave them up, the rights to Tosca were awarded to Puccini! Premiered in Rome in January of 1900, Tosca marked another triumph for Puccini, but the road to success was not smooth nor uneventful. There was the usual squabbling, of course, between the composer and his librettists, and a bomb scare caused the opera's first few moments to be repeated on opening night. But what was indeed unusual was Ricordi's initial negative reaction to Tosca's third act as Puccini composed it, and additionally, the composer's determination to stick to exactly what he had written despite his benefactor's uneasy misgivings. The main problem that Ricordi had with the act was Puccini's use of some music from Edgar, which was inserted in the duet passage that begins with Cavaradossi's "O dolci mani." In a long and passionate letter that spelled out his motives and methods in composing the way he did, Puccini pointed out that it would be truly remarkable if anyone recognized the music's original source and, even if they did, the music fit perfectly with the situation. Think what you might about many aspects of Puccini's character, but in this case the composer displayed tremendous courage and artistic brilliance at the same time. To his great credit, Ricordi signed off on the project and the entire opera was performed as written. |
|||
After three consecutive triumphs, and his financial well-being assured for good, Puccini was as self-confident as he would ever be. He was even confident enough to find his very own subject for his next opera. For this he chose Madame Butterfly, a one-act play by the American theatrical wonder, David Belasco (1853-1931). When supervising the London premiere of Tosca in the summer of 1900, Puccini had seen the play and, although he could understand hardly any English, he was deeply moved by its dramatic situations and its operatic potential. Ricordi obtained the rights in 1901 and immediately thereafter Illica and Giocosa began working on the libretto. In preparation for composing, Puccini studied every scrap of authentic Japanese music he could get his hands on so he could give his score an oriental flavor. He also incorporated the opening bars of the Star Spangled Banner in the first tenor aria-duet. These were musical-dramatic touches that were so typical of Puccini's |
|
|
approach to opera composition. With these devices and his signature development of melodic fragments that intensify the almost unbearable pathos of the drama, Madama Butterfly can arguably be considered his ultimate masterpiece. Puccini came a hair's breadth from never finishing the opera when he ran his flashy new automobile off the road on a foggy night near Lucca in February, 1903. Fortunately, he crashed near the home of a physician who attended the composer immediately. Although Puccini suffered a compound fracture of the leg, which was not set right initially and had to be broken again and reset, leaving him with a permanent limp, he recovered from the accident and resumed working on Butterfly. Bolstered by a string of successes and his unshakable belief that he had produced his absolutely finest work, Puccini broke with a personal tradition based on superstition and brought Elvira (whom he had recently married) and Tonio to the La Scala premiere of Madama Butterfly on February 17, 1904. Puccini, however, was horrified when what he thought would be his greatest triumph to date disintegrated into a monstrous fiasco that caused him to pull the production from the stage after the first night. He again exhibited a formidable strength of character when he quickly shook off his considerable embarrassment, made a few, but significant, revisions and had the opera produced at Brescia several months later. This time it was a tremendous hit, and has been one of opera's all time favorites ever since. |
|
![]() Gatti-Casazza, Belasco, Toscanini, Puccini |
Puccini's most spectacular triumph (and possibly the most sensational event in the history of opera) was the 1910 premiere of La fanciulla del West at the Metropolitan Opera in New York. Once again, Puccini had adapted a David Belasco play, The Girl of the Golden West, but this time, a failure was simply impossible. Directly involved in the production that was to take place in the richest city in the world were several of the most celebrated luminaries in opera and entertainment. There was Giulio Gatti-Casazza (1869-1940), the general director of the Met, who had been hired away from La Scala to transform the company from a Teutonic opera house to one with an Italian personality. To help achieve this Gatti hired La Scala musical director Arturo Toscanini, who was to conduct the premiere of Fanciulla, and tenor Enrico Caruso (1873-1921), who would portray the opera's hero, Dick Johnson. As Minnie, the cast featured Czech soprano Emmy Destinn (1878-1930), who had starred |
| in the Covent Garden
premiere of Madama Butterfly with Caruso. Belasco stage
directed the production and Puccini attended the rehearsals and
initial performances. As anticipated, the star-studded premiere of La fanciulla del West was a huge success, but after its eagerly awaited initial productions in the world's great opera houses, the work faded from the repertoire. Although this opera lacks the melodic catchiness of the most popular Puccini works, and can not really be appreciated from purely audio recordings, La fanciulla is an outstanding and emotionally compelling theatrical experience with a brilliant musical score. The same cannot be said, however, about the next few Puccini operas. |
![]() Enrico Caruso |
![]() Emmy Destinn |
|
|
|
|
The composition and production of La rondine (1917) almost caused a permanent rift between Puccini and Toscanini. Originally conceived as an operetta and then commissioned as a light romantic opera for Vienna in the spring of 1914, Puccini wanted to see the project through, even though Italy and Austria went to war with each other. This was merely a tiresome distraction for the completely apolitical Puccini, but because of this attitude, the ultra-patriotic Toscanini considered the composer to be a traitor. |
|
With a dramatically weak libretto by
Giuseppe Adami and Renato Simoni, Puccini's score has little to
recommend it other than the beautiful soprano aria known as "Doretta's
Dream." Premiered in Monte Carlo (a neutral site during World War
I), this opera is hardly played at all today, and would be virtually
forgotten if Puccini had not composed it. Also neglected for their lack of musical and dramatic interest are the authentically verismo opera Il tabarro and the all-female Suor Angelica. These works are the first two of a group of three one-act operas that was produced as Il trittico for the first time at the Met in 1918. The third one-act in the group, Gianni Schicchi, is a hilarious comic opera, with a libretto by Giovacchino Forzano (1884-1970) ingeniously derived from just a few lines about one of the denizens of the Eighth Circle of Hell in the Inferno by Dante Alighieri (1265-1331). It is also a superb and fresh piece of music that features the |
![]() Carlo Gozzi |
![]() Franco Alfano |
| familiar and gorgeous "O mio babbino caro." It did not take long for Puccini to realize that, of the three one-acts, only Gianni Schicchi had lasting appeal, and this irritated him to no end at first, especially when this opera was performed by itself far more often than the others. But even the composer at least came to recognize that all three works played together made for an awfully long evening. | ||
![]() |
![]() Giacomo Puccini |
Puccini never got to see the premiere of his last opera, Turandot (1926), because he died of heart failure brought on by radiation treatment for his throat cancer in Brussels on November 29, 1924. Now why Puccini did not finish the opera is not exactly clear. He had demonstrated before that he could compose under the most trying circumstances, even while enduring physical pain. The great portion of the opera that he did compose is a musical masterpiece that displays his stylistic eclecticism and creative genius. It is possible that the source, an 18th-century play by Carlo Gozzi (1720-1806), was just too much of a fairy tale and lacked the human passions that Puccini was so good at expressing in music. It could also be that the libretto, another by Adami and Simoni, relied too much on a deus-ex-machina plot resolution that failed to inspire the composer. |
| Although the death of
the composer left Turandot unfinished, the work was completed
in true Puccini fashion - in other words, with lots of contention.
Toscanini, who was entrusted by the family to oversee the opera's
completion, was not free to appoint the composer of his
choice, Riccardo Zandonai (1883-1944). Representing the family,
Tonio Puccini instead named Franco Alfano (1875-1954) to compose the
third act according to Puccini's vague outline. Perhaps Tonio was
worried that the more-respected Zandonai would get too much credit
for the project. In any case, Toscanini resented what he perceived
to be an usurpation of his authority and gave Alfano a hard time of
it during rehearsals. It is also possible that this bitterness led
to Toscanini's dramatic laying down of the baton in mid-measure on
opening night. When opera was created in 1597, the idea was to resurrect Greek tragedy. From Aristotle's Poetics the Renaissance Italians knew that music was an element of tragedy but they didn't know how important the music was vis-a-vis the drama. They also could not comprehend the meaning of catharsis, which Aristotle says is the main point of Greek tragedy - that is, to purge the emotions of pity and terror. It took three centuries, but Puccini seems to have found how to combine the proper proportions of music and drama to achieve catharsis in opera. |
||